MCNP5与EGSnrc比较计算125I种子源剂量参数

曹 振; 阮锡超; 孟贝蒂; 石翠燕

doi:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2014.hjs.37.020201

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

MCNP5与EGSnrc比较计算125I种子源剂量参数

低能加速器技术、射线技术及应用 | 更新时间：2021-03-03

- MCNP5与EGSnrc比较计算125I种子源剂量参数
- Determination of dosimetric parameters for 125I seed source using MCNP5 and EGSnrc MC codes
- 核技术 2014年37卷第2期文章编号：020201
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国原子能科学研究院核数据测量与评价技术重点实验室,北京,102413
  2. 原子高科股份有限公司,北京,102413
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "通讯作者: 阮锡超，E-mail: ntof@ciae.ac.cn E-mail:ntof@ciae.ac.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.11889/j.0253-3219.2014.hjs.37.020201
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2014-02-19
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
曹振, 阮锡超, 孟贝蒂, 等. MCNP5与EGSnrc比较计算125I种子源剂量参数[J]. 核技术, 2014,37(2):020201

CAO Zhen, RUAN Xichao, MENG Beidi, et al. Determination of dosimetric parameters for 125I seed source using MCNP5 and EGSnrc MC codes[J]. Nuclear techniques, 2014, 37(2): 020201
曹振, 阮锡超, 孟贝蒂, 等. MCNP5与EGSnrc比较计算125I种子源剂量参数[J]. 核技术, 2014,37(2):020201 DOI： 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2014.hjs.37.020201.

CAO Zhen, RUAN Xichao, MENG Beidi, et al. Determination of dosimetric parameters for 125I seed source using MCNP5 and EGSnrc MC codes[J]. Nuclear techniques, 2014, 37(2): 020201 DOI： 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2014.hjs.37.020201.

摘要

根据AAPM TG43U1的推荐，使用MCNP5与EGSnrc两种蒙特卡罗程序计算6711型125I种子源剂量计算参数，并将两者计算结果和AAPM推荐值比较，得到相对偏差结果如下：剂量率常数，MCNP5为0.62%，EGSnrc为2.07%；径向剂量函数，MNCP5为0.15%?5.12%，EGSnrc为0%?2.18%。两者计算结果均与推荐值符合得很好，而EGSnrc的计算结果更具优势。

Abstract

Background: Seed source has become a popular treatment option in the management of various tumors

particularly in the prostate. Purpose: The aim is to develop accurate and reliable dosimetric parameters that could be used to measure the dose delivered to organs at risk. Methods: Dosimetric parameters (dose rate constant

radial dose function and anisotropy function) of model 6711 125I seed source were calculated with MCNP5 and EGSnrc MC codes following AAPM TG43U1 recommendations. Results: The two results were compared with the relative data recommend by AAPM TG43U1

and the data were as follows: dose rate constant with MCNP5 was in agreement with 0.62%

while that with EGSnrc was 2.07%; radial dose function with MCNP5 was within 0.15%?5.12%

while that with EGSnrc was within 0%?2.48%. Conclusion: The results of two MC codes are in accordance with the recommendations. But that with EGSnrc MC code is better.Cited

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于三晶体耦合γ射线方向探测器的放射源定位

掺杂氧化铋混凝土的辐射屏蔽效果研究及其优化

3 MeV电子辐照加速器主厅内漂移管周围辐射场分析

252Cf(D2O)中子源实验室中子散射的模拟及验证

6711型¹²⁵I种子源剂量参数的蒙特卡罗研究