
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
上海市第六人民医院,上海,200233
纸质出版日期:2000-11-01
移动端阅览
[1]余永利,朱瑞森,季鸿,罗全勇.~(14)C-尿素呼气试验临床应用研究[J].核技术,2000(11):796-799.
YU Yongli, ZHU Ruisen JI Hong, LUO Quanyong. Clinical investigation of 14C - urea breath test[J]. Nuclear techniques, 2000, (11): 796-799.
为探索14C-尿素呼气试验诊断幽门螺旋杆菌的临床实用价值,选用临床患者70例, 2天内同时进行胃镜检查(取胃窦粘膜作病理切片和快速尿素酶试验)和14C-尿素呼气试验(部分患者同时作Hp-IgG或DNAHp试验),病理切片和尿素酶试验双阳性为标准阳性对照,双阴性为标准阴性对照。结果表明,14C-尿素呼气试验灵敏度93.2%,特异性73.1%,与对照标准比较差异不显著(x2-0.9<x20.05(1)-3.84,P>0.05);14C-尿素呼气试验和Hp-IgG试验的诊断正确率分别为85.7%和50%,两者差异非常显著(x2-13.80>x20.01(1)-6.64,P<0.01)。14C尿素呼气试验操作简便,结果可靠,适合临床推广。
To investigate clinical value of 14C-urea breath test (14C-UBT) for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori(Hp)
70 patients were both pertormed gastroscopy (taking gastric mucosae biopsy for rapid urease test and histology) and14C-UBT (some patients by Hp-IgG or DNAHp test also) within two days. The positive cases of both rapid urease test and histology was defined as a gold standard" of Hp-positive
whereas the negative cases of both rapid urease test and histology as "gold standard" of Hp-negative. The sensitivity of 14C-UBT was 93.2%
the specificity 73.1%
and the diagnostic accuracy 85.7%. The difference (comparing with " gold standard") was not marked (x2 = 0.9 < x20.05(1) = 3.84
P> 0.05). But the diagnostic accuracy of 14C-UBT (85.7%) and Hp-IgG (50%) had a marked difference (x2= 13.80>x2 0.01(1)=6.64
P<0.01). Therefore
the 14C-UBT was easy to operate
reliable and suitable for clinical application.
0
浏览量
72
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621