Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P对本底辐射的热释光响应比较

陈劲民; 李永强; 熊正烨; 王文华; 封余军; 黄存友; 汤照; 师文庆

doi:null

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Al₂O₃:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P对本底辐射的热释光响应比较

低能加速器技术、射线技术及应用 | 更新时间：2021-03-05

- Al₂O₃:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P对本底辐射的热释光响应比较
- Thermoluminescence comparison among Al₂O₃:C, LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for natural radiation background measurement
- 核技术 2012年35卷第2期
- 作者机构：
  
  广东海洋大学理学院
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  (No.ZX069)
- DOI：
  中图分类号： R144
- 纸质出版日期：2012-02-01
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
[1]陈劲民,李永强,熊正烨,王文华,封余军,黄存友,汤照,师文庆.Al_2O_3:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P对本底辐射的热释光响应比较[J].核技术,2012,35(02):109-112.

CHEN Jingmin LI Yongqiang XIONG Zhengye WANG Wenhua FENG Yujun HUANG Cunyou TANG Zhao SHI Wenqing. Thermoluminescence comparison among Al₂O₃:C, LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for natural radiation background measurement[J]. Nuclear techniques, 2012, 35(2): 109-112.
[1]陈劲民,李永强,熊正烨,王文华,封余军,黄存友,汤照,师文庆.Al_2O_3:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P对本底辐射的热释光响应比较[J].核技术,2012,35(02):109-112. DOI：

CHEN Jingmin LI Yongqiang XIONG Zhengye WANG Wenhua FENG Yujun HUANG Cunyou TANG Zhao SHI Wenqing. Thermoluminescence comparison among Al₂O₃:C, LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for natural radiation background measurement[J]. Nuclear techniques, 2012, 35(2): 109-112. DOI：

摘要

用Al2O3:C、LiF:Mg

Ti、LiF:Mg

P热释光剂量计（TLD）测量湛江市区本底辐射的热释光响应

以选取适合低辐射场辐射剂量测量的TLD。它们的最低响应剂量依次为Al2O3:C（1–2μGy）、LiF:Mg

P（约2μGy）和LiF:Mg

Ti（>10μGy）。Al2O3:C的热释光峰温较低

对较长时间段（>30 d）的累积剂量

存在较明显的热释光衰退

剂量响应曲线偏离线性;LiF:Mg

P和LiF:Mg

Ti的发光峰温较高

数年内都很稳定。综合考虑灵敏度和稳定性

LiF:Mg

P更宜于低辐射场的累积剂量测量。

Abstract

To select thermoluminescent dosimeters(TLDs) for low radiation research

thermoluminescence responses of Al2O3:C

LiF:Mg

Ti and LiF:Mg

P were measured under natural radiation background in Zhanjiang city

China.TL sensitivity of the three TLDs

in terms of the threshold dose

is sequenced as Al2O3:C(1~2 μGy)

LiF:Mg

P(about 2 μGy)

and LiF:Mg

Ti(>10 μGy).However

as the temperature of glow peak of Al2O3:C is not so high

its TL decays in a relatively long period

hence the non-linearity of the TL dose response curve of Al2O3:C

while temperatures of glow peaks of LiF:Mg

Ti and LiF:Mg

P are higher

hence their linear TL dose response.Therefore

LiF:Mg

P is the best TLD for low radiation cumulative dose detection.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

湖光岩玛尔湖的热释光断代

MeV辐射场中Al₂O₃的剂量学特性

光释光光纤剂量计测量装置的研制

Al2O3:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P对本底辐射的热释光响应比较

Thermoluminescence comparison among Al2O3:C, LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for natural radiation background measurement

DOI：

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Keywords

references

Al₂O₃:C、LiF:Mg,Ti、LiF:Mg,Cu,P对本底辐射的热释光响应比较

Thermoluminescence comparison among Al₂O₃:C, LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for natural radiation background measurement