Comparison of the low energy X-ray responses for six types of LiF
|更新时间:2022-08-16
|
Comparison of the low energy X-ray responses for six types of LiF
Nuclear TechniquesVol. 13, Issue 3, (1990)
作者机构:
中国科学技术大学
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Received:28 March 1988,
Published:01 March 1990
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
Lizhen Zheng, Mingqian Wang, Xin Ju. Comparison of the low energy X-ray responses for six types of LiF[J]. Nuclear techniques, 1990, 13(3): 158-162.
DOI:
Lizhen Zheng, Mingqian Wang, Xin Ju. Comparison of the low energy X-ray responses for six types of LiF[J]. Nuclear techniques, 1990, 13(3): 158-162.DOI:
Comparison of the low energy X-ray responses for six types of LiF
The energy responses of six LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters to 5.8—161.6keV photons are given. It was found that if the energy responses are determined with exposure
LiF (Mg
Ti) is the best one for 12.2—161.6 keV photons and the high sensitivity LiF(Mg
Cu
P) is similar to LiF(Mg
Ti) for the energy responses to 29.2—161.6 keV photons
and that if the energy responses are determined with ambient dose equivalent
LiF(Mg
Ti)-M and LiF(Mg
Cu
P) are beetter than others for 29.2—161.6 keV photons and they are ideal thermoluminescent dosimeters.